Трамп высказался о непростом решении по Ирану09:14
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Lidl GB, Waitrose and Sainsbury's all announced above-inflation pay rises for staff earlier this month.，这一点在同城约会中也有详细论述
铁路部门表示，陈某于 2 月 19 日提交厦门（厦门北）至宜兴的候补订单，并在 2 月 22 日自行购买了另一趟 G1656 次车票，但未取消候补。
，这一点在heLLoword翻译官方下载中也有详细论述
ne particle requires you to know that Old English used negative concord，更多细节参见旺商聊官方下载
This is, to my knowledge, the first published per-font danger rate analysis for Unicode confusables. It suggests that font choice is a meaningful variable in confusable risk, one that confusables.txt does not account for.